Titan Two Consistency problem
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Titan Two Consistency problem
I have had the titan two for a while now but since day one I have noticed inconsistency problems while running a simple script. For my script i have the combo only needing to press Square for 636ms but when I tested it the results come out to the combo holding square for usually 630 or 640 sometimes even 650 but never 636. Is it something in the settings or am I just expecting more that its should do? I'll post my script below as well as then results, any help would be appreciated.
Test Results of Square.
combo Macro2Combo {
set_val(BUTTON_17, 100.00);
wait(630);
set_val(BUTTON_17, 0.00);
set_val(BUTTON_17, 100.00);
wait(640);
set_val(BUTTON_17, 0.00);
set_val(BUTTON_17, 100.00);
wait(650);
set_val(BUTTON_17, 0.00);
}
- Code: Select all
#pragma METAINFO("<Test>", 1, 0, "")
main {
if(event_active(BUTTON_14)){
combo_run(TeamShot);
}
}
combo TeamShot
{
set_val(BUTTON_17, 100.0);
wait(636);
set_val(BUTTON_17, 0.0);
}
Test Results of Square.
combo Macro2Combo {
set_val(BUTTON_17, 100.00);
wait(630);
set_val(BUTTON_17, 0.00);
set_val(BUTTON_17, 100.00);
wait(640);
set_val(BUTTON_17, 0.00);
set_val(BUTTON_17, 100.00);
wait(650);
set_val(BUTTON_17, 0.00);
}
-
GAMERAIDER2011 - Staff Sergeant
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2018 8:14 pm
Re: Titan Two Consistency problem
Yes that is because you are only holding the button with this combo and not releasing, you need to define the release time like that:
set_val(BUTTON_17, 100.00);
wait(630); // hold time
set_val(BUTTON_17, 0.00);
wait(1000); // release time
set_val(BUTTON_17, 100.00);
wait(630); // hold time
set_val(BUTTON_17, 0.00);
wait(1000); // release time
Console tuner since my 1st controller.
Scripting, a game in the game.
Believe or dare, It's Titanic!
Scripting, a game in the game.
Believe or dare, It's Titanic!
-
Prototype - Major General
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2012 1:43 pm
Re: Titan Two Consistency problem
Thanks for the reply I have tried it with the release wait time as well. I just retested just in case.
combo Macro2Combo {
set_val(BUTTON_17, 0.00);
wait(650);
set_val(BUTTON_17, 100.00);
wait(630);
set_val(BUTTON_17, 0.00);
wait(2240);
set_val(BUTTON_17, 100.00);
wait(640);
set_val(BUTTON_17, 0.00);
wait(2220);
set_val(BUTTON_17, 100.00);
wait(630);
set_val(BUTTON_17, 0.00);
wait(2280);
set_val(BUTTON_17, 100.00);
wait(630);
set_val(BUTTON_17, 0.00);
wait(1300);
set_val(BUTTON_17, 100.00);
wait(640);
set_val(BUTTON_17, 0.00);
wait(1930);
}
combo Macro2Combo {
set_val(BUTTON_17, 0.00);
wait(650);
set_val(BUTTON_17, 100.00);
wait(630);
set_val(BUTTON_17, 0.00);
wait(2240);
set_val(BUTTON_17, 100.00);
wait(640);
set_val(BUTTON_17, 0.00);
wait(2220);
set_val(BUTTON_17, 100.00);
wait(630);
set_val(BUTTON_17, 0.00);
wait(2280);
set_val(BUTTON_17, 100.00);
wait(630);
set_val(BUTTON_17, 0.00);
wait(1300);
set_val(BUTTON_17, 100.00);
wait(640);
set_val(BUTTON_17, 0.00);
wait(1930);
}
-
GAMERAIDER2011 - Staff Sergeant
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2018 8:14 pm
Re: Titan Two Consistency problem
Does it works as you want now?
Console tuner since my 1st controller.
Scripting, a game in the game.
Believe or dare, It's Titanic!
Scripting, a game in the game.
Believe or dare, It's Titanic!
-
Prototype - Major General
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2012 1:43 pm
Re: Titan Two Consistency problem
No its still hitting 630 640 and 650. Shouldn't the titan two be able to press and release square at 636ms exactly?
-
GAMERAIDER2011 - Staff Sergeant
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2018 8:14 pm
Re: Titan Two Consistency problem
You recorded that with the Macro Recorder? The Macro Recorder record at 10ms, you have then to edit the macro2combo:
set_val(BUTTON_17, 0.00);
wait(650);
set_val(BUTTON_17, 100.00);
wait(635);
set_val(BUTTON_17, 0.00);
wait(2240);
set_val(BUTTON_17, 100.00);
wait(644);
set_val(BUTTON_17, 0.00);
wait(2220);
set_val(BUTTON_17, 100.00);
wait(633);
set_val(BUTTON_17, 0.00);
wait(2280);
set_val(BUTTON_17, 100.00);
wait(632);
set_val(BUTTON_17, 0.00);
wait(1300);
set_val(BUTTON_17, 100.00);
wait(641);
set_val(BUTTON_17, 0.00);
wait(1930);
set_val(BUTTON_17, 0.00);
wait(650);
set_val(BUTTON_17, 100.00);
wait(635);
set_val(BUTTON_17, 0.00);
wait(2240);
set_val(BUTTON_17, 100.00);
wait(644);
set_val(BUTTON_17, 0.00);
wait(2220);
set_val(BUTTON_17, 100.00);
wait(633);
set_val(BUTTON_17, 0.00);
wait(2280);
set_val(BUTTON_17, 100.00);
wait(632);
set_val(BUTTON_17, 0.00);
wait(1300);
set_val(BUTTON_17, 100.00);
wait(641);
set_val(BUTTON_17, 0.00);
wait(1930);
Console tuner since my 1st controller.
Scripting, a game in the game.
Believe or dare, It's Titanic!
Scripting, a game in the game.
Believe or dare, It's Titanic!
-
Prototype - Major General
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2012 1:43 pm
Re: Titan Two Consistency problem
Yes I used macro recorder to test my script. Is there a better place to test it down to the millisecond? I just feel my titan two is not consistent or at least I would love to prove myself wrong.
-
GAMERAIDER2011 - Staff Sergeant
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2018 8:14 pm
Re: Titan Two Consistency problem
Like i said the Macro Recorder will not record a 636 when converted to macro2combo, it will be rounded to 630/640. But the Titan Two is able to run a 636ms combo, for that you must edit the timings in the combo.
Console tuner since my 1st controller.
Scripting, a game in the game.
Believe or dare, It's Titanic!
Scripting, a game in the game.
Believe or dare, It's Titanic!
-
Prototype - Major General
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2012 1:43 pm
Re: Titan Two Consistency problem
- Code: Select all
#define uwait(t) wait(_uwait(t))
int16 _uwait(int32 wt) {
static int32 _ua;
wt += _ua;
_ua = wt % 1000;
return(wt / 1000);
}
main
{
if(get_actual(BUTTON_14)){
combo_run(UWaitTest);
}
}
combo UWaitTest
{
set_val(BUTTON_17, 100.0);
uwait(636000);
}
Try this new uwait code!
- bonefisher
- Lieutenant General
- Posts: 5413
- Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2015 10:49 am
Re: Titan Two Consistency problem
GAMERAIDER2011 wrote:Yes I used macro recorder to test my script. Is there a better place to test it down to the millisecond? I just feel my titan two is not consistent or at least I would love to prove myself wrong.
if the postp bonefisher and prototype made has helped you, it would be good if you could update this thread.
- creedkiller
- Lieutenant
- Posts: 293
- Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2017 4:08 pm
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 47 guests